1Binding Treaty
46OECD Adherents
193UNESCO Members
29GPAI Members

Table of Contents

1. Overview

International AI governance operates through a complex web of multilateral frameworks, each with different membership, legal status, and scope. Understanding this landscape is essential because national AI regulations are increasingly shaped by — and measured against — these international norms.

Framework Year Legal Status Membership Focus
OECD AI Principles2019 (updated 2024)Non-binding38 OECD + 8 partner countriesTrustworthy AI principles; policy recommendations
UNESCO Recommendation2021Non-binding (normative instrument)193 member statesEthics of AI; values and principles; policy areas
Council of Europe Convention2024Legally binding (treaty)Open to CoE members + non-membersHuman rights, democracy, rule of law in AI
G7 Hiroshima Process2023Non-bindingG7 nationsAdvanced AI (foundation models); code of conduct
GPAI2020Non-binding29 member countriesMulti-stakeholder research and policy
UN Advisory Body2023-2024AdvisoryUN membershipGlobal AI governance architecture

2. OECD AI Principles

2.1 Background

The OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (May 2019, updated May 2024) was the first intergovernmental standard on AI. It has been adopted by 46 countries and has influenced virtually every national AI strategy developed since.

2.2 The Five Principles

Principle Description Implementation Implications
1. Inclusive growth, sustainable development, and well-beingAI should benefit people and the planet, driving inclusive growth, sustainable development, and well-beingImpact assessments; stakeholder engagement; environmental considerations
2. Human-centred values and fairnessAI should respect human rights, democratic values, diversity, and include safeguards for fairness and non-discriminationBias testing; accessibility; human rights due diligence
3. Transparency and explainabilityAI actors should provide meaningful information about AI systems and enable understanding of outputsDocumentation; disclosure obligations; explainability requirements
4. Robustness, security, and safetyAI systems should function appropriately and not pose unreasonable safety risksTesting; risk management; cybersecurity; traceability
5. AccountabilityAI actors should be accountable for the proper functioning of AI systems based on their rolesLiability frameworks; audit mechanisms; redress mechanisms

2.3 2024 Update

The 2024 revision updated the principles to address developments since 2019:

2.4 OECD AI Policy Observatory

The OECD maintains the AI Policy Observatory (OECD.AI), the most comprehensive database of national AI policies worldwide, tracking 800+ policy initiatives across 70+ countries.

3. UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI

3.1 Background

Adopted by all 193 UNESCO member states in November 2021, this is the first global normative instrument on AI ethics. While non-binding, its universal adoption gives it significant normative weight.

3.2 Values & Principles

Category Values/Principles
ValuesHuman rights and human dignity; Living in peaceful, just, and interconnected societies; Ensuring diversity and inclusiveness; Environment and ecosystem flourishing
PrinciplesProportionality and do no harm; Safety and security; Right to privacy and data protection; Multi-stakeholder and adaptive governance; Responsibility and accountability; Transparency and explainability; Human oversight and determination; Awareness and literacy; Fairness and non-discrimination; Sustainability

3.3 Readiness Assessment Methodology

UNESCO developed a Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM) to help countries evaluate their preparedness for ethical AI governance. As of 2025, over 50 countries have completed or are conducting RAM assessments, identifying gaps in legal frameworks, institutional capacity, and technical infrastructure.

4. Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI

4.1 Historic Significance

First Binding International AI Treaty: The Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law (adopted September 2024) is the first legally binding international treaty on AI. Open to both CoE members and non-members (including the US, Canada, Japan, and others who participated in negotiations), it establishes baseline obligations for AI governance worldwide.

4.2 Key Provisions

4.3 Signatories

As of early 2026, the treaty has been signed by the EU, US, UK, Canada, Japan, Israel, and multiple CoE member states. Ratification processes are underway in several countries.

5. G7 Hiroshima AI Process

5.1 Background

Launched at the G7 Summit in Hiroshima (May 2023), the Hiroshima AI Process focused specifically on governance of advanced AI systems, particularly foundation models and generative AI.

5.2 Outputs

Document Content Target
Guiding Principles for Advanced AI11 principles for organizations developing, deploying, and using advanced AI systemsAll actors in AI value chain
Code of Conduct for Advanced AIVoluntary code with detailed actions implementing the guiding principlesPrimarily AI developers
Comprehensive Policy FrameworkPolicy recommendations for G7 governments on AI governanceG7 governments

5.3 The 11 Guiding Principles

  1. Take appropriate measures throughout the development of advanced AI systems
  2. Identify and mitigate risks across the AI lifecycle
  3. Report advanced AI capabilities, limitations, and domains of appropriate/inappropriate use
  4. Invest in responsible AI development
  5. Develop and implement robust information security measures
  6. Develop and deploy reliable content authentication and provenance mechanisms
  7. Prioritize research to mitigate societal, safety, and security risks
  8. Develop and deploy advanced AI systems for identified societal challenges
  9. Invest in developing standards, tools, and practices for responsible AI
  10. Support the development and adoption of international AI standards
  11. Implement appropriate data governance and protection measures

6. Global Partnership on AI (GPAI)

6.1 Structure

GPAI was launched in June 2020 by 15 founding members and has grown to 29 members. In December 2024, GPAI merged with the OECD, becoming the OECD’s AI governance hub.

6.2 Working Groups

Working Group Focus Key Outputs
Responsible AITrustworthy AI implementation; algorithmic fairness; human rightsResponsible AI assessment frameworks; bias mitigation guidance
Data GovernanceData access; sharing; privacy; quality for AIData trusts research; cross-border data flows guidance
Future of WorkAI impact on labor markets; skills; worker rightsWorker voice in AI adoption; skills frameworks
Innovation and CommercializationAI ecosystems; startups; adoption barriersSME AI adoption guides; compute governance research

7. United Nations Activities

7.1 UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI

Established in 2023, the 39-member advisory body published its interim report (“Governing AI for Humanity”) in December 2023 and final report in September 2024:

7.2 UN Agency Activities

Agency AI Activity Focus
ITUAI for Good platform; Focus Groups on AIStandardization; AI for SDGs; health AI; environmental AI
WHOEthics & Governance of AI for HealthHealth AI ethics; LMM guidance; regulatory considerations
ILOAI and the World of WorkLabor market impacts; worker protection; just transitions
WIPOAI and IP policyPatent; copyright; TDM; AI inventorship
UNICEFPolicy Guidance on AI for ChildrenChildren’s rights in AI; age-appropriate design; education
UNHCRAI in humanitarian contextsRefugee identification; humanitarian response; data protection

8. Other Multilateral Initiatives

Initiative Participants Focus Status
UK AI Safety Summit (Bletchley Park)28 countries + EUFrontier AI safety; Bletchley DeclarationAnnual; Seoul 2024; Paris 2025
AI Safety Institutes NetworkUS, UK, Japan, Canada, EU, Singapore, othersCoordination of national AI safety institutes; shared evaluationsOperational; growing membership
REAIM (Responsible AI in the Military Domain)50+ statesMilitary AI governance; Call to ActionSummit 2023 (Netherlands); ongoing
ASEAN Guide on AI Governance10 ASEAN membersRegional AI governance alignment; voluntaryPublished 2024
African Union AI Strategy55 AU membersContinental AI strategy; capacity buildingPublished 2024

9. Comparative Analysis

Dimension OECD UNESCO Council of Europe G7 Hiroshima
Legal StatusRecommendation (non-binding)Recommendation (non-binding)Treaty (binding)Principles (non-binding)
Membership38+8 (wealthy democracies)193 (universal)46 CoE + open7 (G7 nations)
FocusTrustworthy AI; economic policyEthics; human rights; valuesHuman rights; democracy; rule of lawAdvanced/frontier AI safety
EnforcementPeer review; monitoringRAM assessments; reportingConference of Parties; state reportsVoluntary compliance
InfluenceVery high (shaped most national strategies)Symbolic (universal adoption); implementation variesHigh (first binding treaty)High for frontier AI specifically

10. References & Resources

OECD

UNESCO

Council of Europe

G7 & GPAI

United Nations

Previous Copyright & IP Next Technical Standards